the influence of a stack
|
The stacks: they are Apple, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Facebook. Why are they called stacks? Because they are vertically integrated silos that control just about everything to do with consumer-facing technology to some degree. They are the railroads, the steel industry, the shipping magnates, the telegraph companies, the car manufacturers, the banks–take the metaphor best appreciated from the era of technological advancement that best serves your point, and there are comparisons for the way that these five companies control a vast network of industries, products, and consumer behavior by the sheer weight of their influence. If that is too complex to think about, just think about their economic impact alone. Their trillions of dollars in yearly income dwarfs that of countries. But while to understand the importance of the stacks one just has to throw a cell phone far enough to hit another cell phone, I’m not sure that the stacks are as important as nation-states–not quite yet. There is a certain sort of influence that we are privileging when we talk about the stacks, and that is a privilege of information. It is a media power, not a thing of direct force. It is a power of panopticons, not a power of police.
But a panopticon cannot function without physical prison walls, and a police force cannot function without its badges. The difference between physical weapons and informational weapons is growing more complex, as the power relationships change. What counts as a manufactured weapon is changing, depending on the context. When Apple computers are used by the government, they become a contractor. When Facebook or Amazon’s intelligence gathering algorithms function better than intelligence agencies, all it takes it a contract to make them part of the military industrial complex.
And this is what a stack is–it’s a mystery. It’s a new label, for something that is similar to the nations, armies, and industries that we have already identified, but yet are quite different. The stack is a type of nation that we haven’t quite figured out yet. They are the entities of future history, and we don’t even know how they work. They might not even know themselves. |





